A recent discussion on social media of a book in metaethics, self-published five years ago and authored by someone who had left academia, prompted questions about whether a review of the book would ever appear in an academic philosophy journal.
![](https://dailynous.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/bourgeois-louis-the-puritan-4.png)
[Louise Bourgeois, plate 4 from The Puritan]
- How do you decide which books to solicit reviews of?
- Do you ever accept review proposals from prospective reviewers?
- How recently must a book have been published to be considered for a review?
- Would you ever publish a review of a self-published book?
- What general restrictions, if any, are there on selecting books for review at your journal?
- To what extent are review decisions a function of publisher behavior (emailing you about books, proactively sending the journal review copies)?
Readers are welcome to suggest additional questions. Editors, please take a moment to respond. Thanks.
"Review" - Google News
June 21, 2021 at 09:16PM
https://ift.tt/3cVRheI
Philosophy Journals' Book Review Policies and Practices - Daily Nous
"Review" - Google News
https://ift.tt/2YqLwiz
https://ift.tt/3c9nRHD
Bagikan Berita Ini
0 Response to "Philosophy Journals' Book Review Policies and Practices - Daily Nous"
Post a Comment